While many attempts at demonstrating the issues with Futurist Eschatology focus on issues such as the time statements throughout the New Testament, fewer delve into the deeper and wider ramifications that their system would create. While an solid argument, such as the time statements, should be enough to satisfy the burden of proof that futurism is a dead case, closer scrutiny only makes it more and more obvious that there is little to their case from the Text. Not dismissing the arguments against many streams of preterism, and the case for Israel, this paper looks at the reasons why nearly all futurist eschatology fail, as they all rely on the same underlying streams of thought, some of these which are presented as appearing to fail.